Return to Uncreativelabs.net front page Uncreative Labs
PC XT and AT forums
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

 16MHz ISA View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
Anonymous Coward



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Shandong, China

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:59 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Who was it in here that was running their ISA bus at 16MHz?

From what I understand, some cards (such as the Mach64), are infact capable of running at this speed. However, in most cases this is useless since none of the other ISA cards on the bus are likely to work at that speed. So, the solution is to replace those cards with new ones that work at 16MHz.

Are there any network cards, or sound cards that are happy at 16MHz?
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
ryan



Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 261
Location: WisConSin

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:15 am Reply with quoteBack to top

I had gotten mine up to 20mhz no problems (25mhz and the hd would always corrupt), generic isa ide multifunction card with an old Quantum fireball 540mb hd, trident 1mb video card and an old 14.4 modem. I managed this on a overclocked 486sx25 to 40mhz (80mhz crystal) with a 1/2 bus ratio on an old micronics motherboard. I could actually make the crappy trident run halfway decent frame rates on video that way. At that time I didn't have enough ram to make it really worth while though.

As for your poor VESA VLB hd performance I think its all in what hd you use and the controller, I had a PIO4 VLB hard disk controller with a AMD 5x86 133 bought new in 96 in a Yorkshire generic computer (anyone remember them?) At that time I usually didn't bother looking at the brand names inside my computer so I can't say what brand it would have been though I know the mobo would probably have been PCChips or Freetech I sold that system at a profit a year later.

This would be a more reputable pentium vlb mobo if you could find one http://stason.org/TULARC/pc/motherboards/A/AMERICAN-MEGATRENDS-INC-Pentium-EXCALIBUR-VLB-Pent.html

http://www.ryston.cz/petr/vlb/pdf/759ads.pdf

Hmm pio4 vlb card, I wonder if any can be found now
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Anonymous Coward



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Shandong, China

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:18 am Reply with quoteBack to top

20MHz is pretty impressive, but did you do any long term stability testing? Did you have to play with any other settings in the BIOS other than just changing the clock divider. From what I understand it is usually also possible to add wait states.

I tried to find some information on running ISA at high frequencies, but from what I've seen it doesn't seem many companies produced cards that can handle the narrower pulse widths. All sound card manufacturers recommend 8MHz setting. I've never had any luck running at SCSI controller faster than 10MHz (though I do have a 1542CP from 1995 that may do better). It seems that only a few video boards are able to run at high speeds reliably. I think I'd be lucky to get stable operation at 12MHz.

As for the VLB Pentium, I just don't know if it's worth the time or money to change to SCSI. It seems that VLB can only do "bus mastering" between the HDD and controller, so in reality is just a PIO card...be it SCSI or EIDE. PIO4 VLB cards aren't uncommon, I have three of them. Also,I don't think changing motherboards would help at all. The AMI boards are of course wonderful, but my current one runs fine. Besides, I don't call my system the "World's Crappiest Pentium" for nothing.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
ryan



Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 261
Location: WisConSin

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:42 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

One thing I left out I could not add any more isa cards and my sound card was definately out. Another point of interest is that this was a cacheless plug AKA only cache on the cpu. I did not have any issues for several months running it that way but I also only used it for certain things, emulation, games etc. I did not burn it in so It may well have operated incorrectly in a burn in situation but it did run Windows 95 stably, duke nukem was fine as were my favorite emulated NES games.

16mhz (16.6666) allowed me to use a sound card and the system didn't have any limitations as to the number of isa cards at 20mhz beyond the core 2 cards I had to have I could only seem to get one more in and most cards wouldn't work anyway that did something usefull like a NIC or Modem.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
 Jump to:   
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001/3 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT